on a topic in one place. No need to visit several r
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:17 am
Main features
The key purpose of Google Scholar is to search for scientific materials. Moreover, it can be done both by topics in general and more specifically - by titles and authors. Its advantages as a search engine:
Guaranteed quality of results. The user can be sure that he will buy kazakhstan telemarketing data not come across the slag of the Global Network.
The ability to find all materials esources to search for different scientometric data (after all, not everything included in Web of Science will be found in Scopus and RINTS, and vice versa).
Select your own library in your personal account. The articles you are interested in will not be lost.
Tracking citations of your own works. A more complete picture emerges than when analyzing mentions separately in different scientometric databases.
Self-presentation. Google Scholar provides greater opportunities for presenting a scientist on the Internet, which contributes to his recognition and, as a result, to increased citation.
It is convenient that working with Google Scholar is absolutely free. You don't even need to register to search. Authorization via a Google account is necessary to fill out a profile and form a library.
How is it different from Elibrary?
As already noted, Google Scholar is not a scientometric database, so parallels with RINTS should not be drawn. However, an association with Elibrary immediately comes to mind. But even with this resource, the “Academy” does not have many similarities, but more differences:
Geographical scale. Elibrary is dominated by publications in Russian-language editions. Google Scholar accumulates materials from all over the world and in almost all languages.
Coverage of databases. In Elibrary, this is mainly the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) and the Russian-language segment of Web of Science (RSCI). Google Scholar inde
The key purpose of Google Scholar is to search for scientific materials. Moreover, it can be done both by topics in general and more specifically - by titles and authors. Its advantages as a search engine:
Guaranteed quality of results. The user can be sure that he will buy kazakhstan telemarketing data not come across the slag of the Global Network.
The ability to find all materials esources to search for different scientometric data (after all, not everything included in Web of Science will be found in Scopus and RINTS, and vice versa).
Select your own library in your personal account. The articles you are interested in will not be lost.
Tracking citations of your own works. A more complete picture emerges than when analyzing mentions separately in different scientometric databases.
Self-presentation. Google Scholar provides greater opportunities for presenting a scientist on the Internet, which contributes to his recognition and, as a result, to increased citation.
It is convenient that working with Google Scholar is absolutely free. You don't even need to register to search. Authorization via a Google account is necessary to fill out a profile and form a library.
How is it different from Elibrary?
As already noted, Google Scholar is not a scientometric database, so parallels with RINTS should not be drawn. However, an association with Elibrary immediately comes to mind. But even with this resource, the “Academy” does not have many similarities, but more differences:
Geographical scale. Elibrary is dominated by publications in Russian-language editions. Google Scholar accumulates materials from all over the world and in almost all languages.
Coverage of databases. In Elibrary, this is mainly the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) and the Russian-language segment of Web of Science (RSCI). Google Scholar inde