order to avoid future legal disputes.
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 5:29 am
he grantor to verify the authenticity of the applicant’s documents in terms of ensuring the fulfillment of obligations under the initiative concession agreement.
Thus, it seems appropriate to us, firstly, to increase the period for considering a proposal to conclude a concession agreement to 30 working days, and secondly, to establish the obligation of the concession grantor to verify the authenticity of the applicant’s documents in terms of ensuring the fulfillment of obligations under the initiative concession agreement in
At the beginning of the article, the author formulated the goal in detail (or rather, three at once). It is obvious that the study of the mechanism for concluding a concession agreement with persons coming forward with the relevant initiative has been carried out in sufficient depth. The analysis of the relevant legislation has been carried out, and the author has identified gaps in it. The development of proposals and recommendations for minimizing similar disputes, if possible, has also been successful. Thus, the bahamas telemarketing data author has solved all the tasks set. The specification of proposals may become a direction for new works on this topic.
Recommendations to the author : none.
3. As the analysis showed, inspections to monitor compliance with orders are not effective and do not carry a punitive or educational burden. In 75% of cases, inspections in 2020 and 84% of inspections in 2019 were carried out without violating the law.
It is proposed to exclude inspections under subparagraph 1) of paragraph 3 of Article 144 of the PC, which will allow, on average, taking into account the indicators of 2018-2020, to reduce the number of unscheduled inspections by 24%, since they are more of a formal nature, and the violations identified are mostly eliminated by entrepreneurs.
It is also proposed to exclude inspections to monitor compliance with the order and under subparagraph 1-1) of paragraph 3 of Article 144 of the PC, and in the event of failure to provide information on compliance with the order in accordance with paragraphs 9), 10) of Article 152 and paragraphs 7) and 8) of Article 152-1 of the PC, not to conduct an unscheduled inspection, but to include violators in the schedule of inspections under a special procedure and preventive control lists.
At the same time, it is necessary to determine the timeframes for e
Thus, it seems appropriate to us, firstly, to increase the period for considering a proposal to conclude a concession agreement to 30 working days, and secondly, to establish the obligation of the concession grantor to verify the authenticity of the applicant’s documents in terms of ensuring the fulfillment of obligations under the initiative concession agreement in
At the beginning of the article, the author formulated the goal in detail (or rather, three at once). It is obvious that the study of the mechanism for concluding a concession agreement with persons coming forward with the relevant initiative has been carried out in sufficient depth. The analysis of the relevant legislation has been carried out, and the author has identified gaps in it. The development of proposals and recommendations for minimizing similar disputes, if possible, has also been successful. Thus, the bahamas telemarketing data author has solved all the tasks set. The specification of proposals may become a direction for new works on this topic.
Recommendations to the author : none.
3. As the analysis showed, inspections to monitor compliance with orders are not effective and do not carry a punitive or educational burden. In 75% of cases, inspections in 2020 and 84% of inspections in 2019 were carried out without violating the law.
It is proposed to exclude inspections under subparagraph 1) of paragraph 3 of Article 144 of the PC, which will allow, on average, taking into account the indicators of 2018-2020, to reduce the number of unscheduled inspections by 24%, since they are more of a formal nature, and the violations identified are mostly eliminated by entrepreneurs.
It is also proposed to exclude inspections to monitor compliance with the order and under subparagraph 1-1) of paragraph 3 of Article 144 of the PC, and in the event of failure to provide information on compliance with the order in accordance with paragraphs 9), 10) of Article 152 and paragraphs 7) and 8) of Article 152-1 of the PC, not to conduct an unscheduled inspection, but to include violators in the schedule of inspections under a special procedure and preventive control lists.
At the same time, it is necessary to determine the timeframes for e