scientific articles article reviews
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 7:01 am
Recommendations to the author : expand the conclusion by providing a thesis presentation of the identified problem; create a basis for new research.
We also recommend reading
Katerina Denisova September 5, 2020 scientific articles article reviews
Review of the best articles of "Young Scientist" No. 34 (324)
The next issue of the scientific journal "Young Scientist" was not long in coming. This time we again encountered the problem of a lack of quality introductions and conclusions. But we were pleasantly surprised by the tendency to increase competent annotations (in the current review there will be twice as many as usual). Let's consider the best examples of meta-data and give recommendations for their improvement.
Katerina Denisova August 29, 2020
Review of the best articles of "Young Scientist" No. 33 (323)
Yes, "Young Scientist" does not make it a mandatory requirement to have annotations and keywords. However, it is better to develop a habit of adding them to all studies. Then in the future you will not portugal telemarketing list have difficulties with their compilation. And you will be able to get into the next review of successful works.
Katerina Denisova August 21, 2020 scientific articles article reviews
Review of the best articles of "Young Scientist" No. 32 (322)
A new issue of the scientific journal "Young Scientist" has been published. We continue to analyze the metadata that beginning researchers use to accompany their works. The best titles, abstracts, keywords, introductions, and conclusions will be highlighted again. Authors will also receive several useful recommendations on how to improve their scientific writing skills.
Continuation:
Harmful Advice on Writing Conclusions
We also recommend reading
Katerina Denisova April 20, 2020 scientific articles university miscellaneous RINTS postgraduate study
General information about publications in Scopus and Web of Science
In the scientific community, everyone has heard at least once about publications in Scopus and Web of Science. But, as practice shows, only those whose lists of works include them can say exactly what they are. Thanks to the efforts of others, these publications are surrounded by all sorts of myths. Let's try
We also recommend reading
Katerina Denisova September 5, 2020 scientific articles article reviews
Review of the best articles of "Young Scientist" No. 34 (324)
The next issue of the scientific journal "Young Scientist" was not long in coming. This time we again encountered the problem of a lack of quality introductions and conclusions. But we were pleasantly surprised by the tendency to increase competent annotations (in the current review there will be twice as many as usual). Let's consider the best examples of meta-data and give recommendations for their improvement.
Katerina Denisova August 29, 2020
Review of the best articles of "Young Scientist" No. 33 (323)
Yes, "Young Scientist" does not make it a mandatory requirement to have annotations and keywords. However, it is better to develop a habit of adding them to all studies. Then in the future you will not portugal telemarketing list have difficulties with their compilation. And you will be able to get into the next review of successful works.
Katerina Denisova August 21, 2020 scientific articles article reviews
Review of the best articles of "Young Scientist" No. 32 (322)
A new issue of the scientific journal "Young Scientist" has been published. We continue to analyze the metadata that beginning researchers use to accompany their works. The best titles, abstracts, keywords, introductions, and conclusions will be highlighted again. Authors will also receive several useful recommendations on how to improve their scientific writing skills.
Continuation:
Harmful Advice on Writing Conclusions
We also recommend reading
Katerina Denisova April 20, 2020 scientific articles university miscellaneous RINTS postgraduate study
General information about publications in Scopus and Web of Science
In the scientific community, everyone has heard at least once about publications in Scopus and Web of Science. But, as practice shows, only those whose lists of works include them can say exactly what they are. Thanks to the efforts of others, these publications are surrounded by all sorts of myths. Let's try