The Committee also supported the ECtHR’s case
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:28 am
Also pay attention to letters allegedly coming from your hosting, your domain registrar, etc., if in doubt, contact the support service of the hosting, registrar, etc. by logging into your personal account in the appropriate place. Do not follow links from letters and do not perform dubious actions that possible scammers ask you to do.Denmark). Moreover, the United Nations treaty bodies have been severely criticized for using unorthodox ways to find that conduct falls within a State’s jurisdiction, in particular with regard to cases dealing with issues such as climate change, rescue at sea operations, and the detention of nationals in foreign territories. The CRPD Committee itself issued a quite unconventional decision, in Sherlock v Australia, where it found that a person with multiple sclerosis who had had her visa application rejected on the ground that she needed to take several medicines was subject to Australia’s jurisdiction.
In the present case, the CRPD founded its entire reasoning on what Berkes considers to be ‘the dominant opinion on the territorial’s State‘s jurisdiction over a ‘grey zone’. (at 76). As such, it shows the whatsapp number list willingness of the CRPD Committee to borrow from the European Court’s jurisprudence in matters in which it has developed a genuine expertise, perhaps hoping that the ECtHR will do the same with regard to the Committee in matters relating to the rights of persons with disabilities.
law by citing cases of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Concluding Observations of the HRC on Moldova, and Georgia, Concluding Observations of CAT on Ukraine, Concluding Observation of CRC on Iraq, and CESCR Concluding Observation on the Central African Republic. Although some of these, especially the IACtHR jurisprudence, are more exactly pertaining to the attribution of acts of non-state armed groups to the State, and the positive obligation to act in due diligence, they implicitly confirm that there is an irrebuttable presumption of jurisdiction of a State over its territory.
In the present case, the CRPD founded its entire reasoning on what Berkes considers to be ‘the dominant opinion on the territorial’s State‘s jurisdiction over a ‘grey zone’. (at 76). As such, it shows the whatsapp number list willingness of the CRPD Committee to borrow from the European Court’s jurisprudence in matters in which it has developed a genuine expertise, perhaps hoping that the ECtHR will do the same with regard to the Committee in matters relating to the rights of persons with disabilities.
law by citing cases of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Concluding Observations of the HRC on Moldova, and Georgia, Concluding Observations of CAT on Ukraine, Concluding Observation of CRC on Iraq, and CESCR Concluding Observation on the Central African Republic. Although some of these, especially the IACtHR jurisprudence, are more exactly pertaining to the attribution of acts of non-state armed groups to the State, and the positive obligation to act in due diligence, they implicitly confirm that there is an irrebuttable presumption of jurisdiction of a State over its territory.